Low-dose radiation cancer susceptibility models

the biological effects of low-dose radiation exposure are increasingly better understood, continued research is needed to develop better individual risk-based models. Human population exposures to low doses of ionizing radiation (defined by the US Department of Energy as less than 10 rem or 0.1 Sv) are increasing due to occupational exposures of nuclear plant workers, waste managers and medical workers, and increasing use in security screening and medical diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. The annual dose to the American population has doubled over the last 20 years [1]. This is causing growing concerns in many communities since the potential adverse health effects of low-dose radiation exposure are not well understood. Currently, risk predictions are based on a one-size-fits-all linear-no-threshold model (the LNT model). This model predicts that (cancer) risk from radiation exposure is linearly related to exposed dose. While this model may be appropriate for risk predictions at high doses, the shape of the dose response curve at low doses is not well understood. We, and others, have provided evidence against the LNT risk model in the low-dose region of exposure and have shown that low-dose radiation responses appear to be strongly influenced by genetic makeup [2]. Clearly, epidemiological data are important and suggest that low dose exposures can increase cancer risk, but existing data remains controversial [3]. However, detecting genetic variants that dictate the low-dose radiation response in human populations is fraught with difficulties. The genetic heterogeneity in humans necessitates the collection of large numbers of DNA samples from patients and control populations, with no guarantee that the methods presently available would allow the detection of the most important genetic variations. Furthermore, the host environment (including other exposures, diet, lifestyle, etc) and individual health status are likely to play a determining role in the low-dose radiation response, but are difficult to control in human populations. On the other hand, parallel studies in mice offer many advantages for the study of the genetic basis of complex traits. These include: well-designed populations for a specific question, standardized husbandry, comprehensive analysis of phenotypes and the ability to manipulate the system. Furthermore, to recapitulate genetic hetero-Editorial zygosity of humans, two powerful genetically distinct mouse resources, Diversity Outbred (DO) and Collaborative Cross (CC) mice, have been generated by the mouse research community [4, 5]. DO and CC mice will enable researchers to rapidly map genetic loci at high resolution and identify individual genes involved in …